Skip to Content

The Guideline for Pneumatic Tourniquet Safety was approved by the AORN Guidelines Advisory Board and became effective as of May 11, 2020. The recommendations in the guideline are intended to be achievable and represent what is believed to be an optimal level of practice. Policies and procedures will reflect variations in practice settings and/or clinical situations that determine the degree to which the guideline can be implemented. AORN recognizes the many diverse settings in which perioperative nurses practice; therefore, this guideline is adaptable to all areas where operative or other invasive procedures may be performed.


This document provides guidance to perioperative team members for the safe use of pneumatic tourniquets during operative or other invasive procedures. The guideline provides information about applying and removing tourniquet cuffs; monitoring a patient before, during, and after tourniquet inflation; and maintaining tourniquet equipment.

Pneumatic tourniquets are used to obtain a near bloodless field during extremity surgeries or to confine a bolus of intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) in an extremity. Pneumatic tourniquets provide arterial occlusion through an automated pressure regulator and are attached by tubing to a bladder in a cuff that fits the extremity circumferentially. Surgeons and anesthesia professionals continue to use pneumatic tourniquets,1-5  although there is conflicting evidence as to whether complications such as increased estimated blood loss and increased blood transfusion rates outweigh the benefits of their use. Researchers define estimated blood loss in multiple ways and use varying terminology for blood loss during pneumatic tourniquet–assisted procedures, including measured, intraoperative, postoperative, calculated, and total blood loss. Many researchers have found that tourniquet use decreases intraoperative and measured blood loss, but there can be a paradoxical increase in postoperative blood loss, which may result in a total blood loss that is comparable to blood loss when no tourniquet is used.6-8 

Some researchers have concluded that extremity surgery without a tourniquet can be safe and efficient for patients with certain conditions.6-10  Although serious patient injuries related to the use of pneumatic tourniquets are uncommon, some patient conditions may increase the risk for complications associated with pneumatic tourniquet use. These conditions include diabetic neuropathy,11  previous revascularization,12  sickle cell anemia,11,13  severe infection,13  and a history of or current venous thromboembolism (VTE).11,13  Complications that have been associated with pneumatic tourniquet use include uncomfortable skin redness,14  chemical burns,14-17  compartment syndrome,18  femoral nerve palsy,19  acute pulmonary edema,20  cardiac arrest,21  and fatal pulmonary edema.22 

Tourniquets used for phlebotomy or traumatic bleeding (eg, field tourniquets) are outside the scope of this document. Other topics beyond the scope of this guideline include

  • the use of medications to

    • prevent tourniquet complications (eg, heparin, steroids),

    • reduce ischemia damage (eg, dexamethasone, antioxidants),

    • alleviate pain during inflation (eg, oxygen, magnesium), and

    • facilitate hemostasis (eg, epinephrine, tranexamic acid);

  • preconditioning techniques;

  • reperfusion techniques;

  • techniques for staggered tourniquet deflation; and

  • prevention and management of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (See the AORN Guideline for Care of the Patient Receiving Local Anesthesia23 ).

Evidence Review

A medical librarian with a perioperative background conducted a systematic search of the databases Ovid MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase®, EBSCO CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The search was limited to literature published in English from January 2012 through February 2019. At the time of the initial search, weekly alerts were created on the topics included in that search. Results from these alerts were provided to the lead author until September 2019. The lead author requested additional articles that either did not fit the original search criteria or were discovered during the evidence appraisal process. The lead author and the medical librarian also identified relevant guidelines from government agencies, professional organizations, and standards-setting bodies.

Search terms included acido*, acute capillary rupture syndrome, adductor canal block, adjustment pressure, ankle block, arm injur*, arterial occlusion pressure determination, arterial occlusion pressure estimation, arterial tourniquet, arthroplasty, avascular necrosis, Bier block, blood pressure, bloodless field, bloodless surgery, brachial plexus neuropath*, calcifications, carbon dioxide, cardiac output, chemoprophylaxis, compartment syndromes, competencies, compression injur*, conduction an*thesia, conscious sedation, cuff injur*, cuff pain, damaged muscle tissue, digital block, disease transmission (infectious), distal tourniquet, DVT, elastic band, elastic bandages, elastic tourniquet cuff, elective surgical procedures, Esmarch bandage, exsanguinat*, extremities, extremity girth, fat embolism syndrome, foot injur*, functional outcomes, gauze bandage, hand injur*, hemodynamic effects, hemostasis (surgical), hidden blood loss, hyperemia, hypox*, iatrogenic fracture, inflation pressure, interface pressure, inter-tourniquet distances, intracranial pressure, intravenous regional an*sthesia, ischemi*, latex allergy, leg injur*, limb circumference, limb elevation, limb occlusion pressure determination, limb occlusion pressure estimation, limb surgery, local inflammation, lower extremity, maintain pressure, metabolic changes, metabolic effects, metabolic events, metabolic phenomena, microbial colonization of tourniquet, microvascular function, minimizing cuff pressure, muscle atrophy, musculoskeletal injur*, nerve injur*, nerve palsy, neuromuscular injur*, Northwick Park, nursing assessment, nursing care, nylon cuff, occlusion of vasculature, occlusion protocols, orthopedics, osteogenesis imperfecta, oxidative stress, oxygen consumption, pain measurement, paired tourniquet, paradoxical blood loss, paresthesia, patient comfort, patient experience, patient pain perception, patient positioning, patient preference, patient reported outcomes, patient satisfaction, performance metrics, perioperative assessment, perioperative care, peripheral block, peripheral nervous system diseases, phalange surgery, pneumatic tourniquet, postocclusive reactive hyperemia, postoperative anemia, postoperative complications, postoperative knee swelling, postoperative recovery, proximal tourniquet, pulmonary embolism, pulse, pulse oximetry monitoring, radial neuropath*, regulate pressure, reinflation, reperfusion injur*, respiration, rhabdomyolysis, Rhys Davies, routine practice, Rumpel-Leede phenomenon, sickle cell, silicon ring, simulated use of tourniquets, simulated training, skin integrity, skin lesions, soft tissue injur*, squeeze method, surgery (elective), surgery (operative), surgical hemostasis, surgical procedures (operative), systemic inflammation, systemic inflammatory response, thromboembolic events, tissue oxygen saturation, tourniquet, tourniquet width, tourniquet failure, tourniquet hypertension, tourniquet inflation, tourniquet injur*, tourniquet pain, tourniquet release timing, tourniquet time, tourniquet tolerance, tourniquet width, tourniquets, tumescent local an*thesia infiltration, two tourniquet sequential block, ulnar neuropath*, upper extremity, vascular injur*, venous congestion, venous occlusion technique, venous reflux, vital signs, and wide tourniquet cuff.

Included were research and non-research literature in English, complete publications, and publications with dates within the time restriction when available. Historical studies were also included. Excluded were non-peer-reviewed publications and older evidence within the time restriction when more recent evidence was available. Editorials, news items, and other brief items were excluded. Low-quality evidence was excluded when higher-quality evidence was available, and literature outside the time restriction was excluded when literature within the time restriction was available. Studies that evaluated exsanguination without the use of a pneumatic tourniquet were excluded (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Flow Diagram of Literature Search Results

Flow Diagram of Literature Search Results

Adapted from: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Atman DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):e1000097.

Articles identified in the search were provided to the project team for evaluation. The team consisted of the lead author and one evidence appraiser. The lead author and the evidence appraiser reviewed and critically appraised each article using the AORN Research or Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tools as appropriate. A second appraiser was consulted in the event of a disagreement between the lead author and the primary evidence appraiser. The literature was independently evaluated and appraised according to the strength and quality of the evidence. Each article was then assigned an appraisal score. The appraisal score is noted in brackets after each reference as applicable.

Each recommendation rating is based on a synthesis of the collective evidence, a benefit-harm assessment, and consideration of resource use. The strength of the recommendation was determined using the AORN Evidence Rating Model and the quality and consistency of the evidence supporting a recommendation. The recommendation strength rating is noted in brackets after each recommendation.

Note: The evidence summary table is available at

Editor’s note: MEDLINE is a registered trademark of the US National Library of Medicine’s Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System, Bethesda, MD. Embase is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, is a registered trademark of EBSCO Industries, Birmingham, AL.

Read MoreShow Less

Interested in facility access to eGuidelines+?